Okay, that's just my UW, heritage talking, sorry Laurier folks. Anyway, the person who made that posting was in London (England.) He got arrested, and just spent nearly three days in jail before posting bail. He was interviewed upon release, and it came out that:
- He didn't think this would happen, or that it would be taken seriously
- He doesn't know anything about Laurier, and was only copying it's name from another post.
- He assumed that freedom of speech covered this sort of thing
But now we have a couple of problems: in the Internet age, you can yell “fire” from the other side of the planet, and there's a lot of people who think freedom of speech means freedom from consequences. Actually, three problems: there’s also our increasingly fuzzy definition of irony. Afterall, our perpetrator said he didn’t think his threat would be taken seriously, since it was on 4chan, a site known for pranks. I can see how a person might assume that, since many things of questionable taste happen there without affecting the real world. But the flipside is that if a person were to plan a shooting rampage, an untraceable discussion board is exactly where they would talk about it.
We’re left with a big overlap between what people think is acceptable online, and what raises red flags for law enforcement. So we’re going to have to create some new understandings about what is legal, and someone is going to be very disappointed.
No comments:
Post a Comment